By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Why Xbox 360 Gamers Don't Want MAG

If it was executed properly I would play a MAG type game. But It would have to be made by Bungie. Only they could perfect it.



Around the Network
selnor said:
If it was executed properly I would play a MAG type game. But It would have to be made by Bungie. Only they could perfect it.

meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeh

not really brosev, bungie perfect lol ummm no, make it differnet ummmm yess. lol MAG is a hardcore tactical fps, is any halo ever ever a hradcore tactical fps ummmmmmm no, so take that perfection with a grain of salt, if bungie made a mag clone it would be the following:

A. accessible, super duper simple

B. Acade as hell and.... lacking in all forms of teamwork, tactics, and strategy

C. guaranteed to sell millions.

basically everything the current MAG is not. but that's just the thing while that's fine for you, for us small band of hardcore fps players, that's sooooooo san francisco LMAO.

zipper touch bungie in arcade fps no way, no how


Bungie touch Zipper in hardcore tactical, not a chance in hell



gamings_best said:
selnor said:
If it was executed properly I would play a MAG type game. But It would have to be made by Bungie. Only they could perfect it.

meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeh

not really brosev, bungie perfect lol ummm no, make it differnet ummmm yess. lol MAG is a hardcore tactical fps, is any halo ever ever a hradcore tactical fps ummmmmmm no, so take that perfection with a grain of salt, if bungie made a mag clone it would be the following:

A. accessible, super duper simple

B. Acade as hell and.... lacking in all forms of teamwork, tactics, and strategy

C. guaranteed to sell millions.

basically everything the current MAG is not. but that's just the thing while that's fine for you, for us small band of hardcore fps players, that's sooooooo san francisco LMAO.

zipper touch bungie in arcade fps no way, no how


Bungie touch Zipper in hardcore tactical, not a chance in hell

But if I wanted that, I'd play Battlefield Bad Company. ;)



lol, most ps3 gamers dont want MAG either. This was pretty irrelevant



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

I'm a 360 owner and I would play MAG, the article definitely doesn't not speak for all of us. In fact, I rarely play games online, but when I do I prefer objective based stuff and what I've seen so far of MAG has me interested.



Around the Network

for the same reason Ps3 players don't want halo.

Because there is tons of option for FPS.



selnor said:
gamings_best said:
selnor said:
If it was executed properly I would play a MAG type game. But It would have to be made by Bungie. Only they could perfect it.

meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeh

not really brosev, bungie perfect lol ummm no, make it differnet ummmm yess. lol MAG is a hardcore tactical fps, is any halo ever ever a hradcore tactical fps ummmmmmm no, so take that perfection with a grain of salt, if bungie made a mag clone it would be the following:

A. accessible, super duper simple

B. Acade as hell and.... lacking in all forms of teamwork, tactics, and strategy

C. guaranteed to sell millions.

basically everything the current MAG is not. but that's just the thing while that's fine for you, for us small band of hardcore fps players, that's sooooooo san francisco LMAO.

zipper touch bungie in arcade fps no way, no how


Bungie touch Zipper in hardcore tactical, not a chance in hell

But if I wanted that, I'd play Battlefield Bad Company. ;)

seriously doesn't come close to MAG, and if it does then you are not playing MAG right.