lol'z @common man, yeah
but inbefortehfanboys
look as I keep on trying to say, and no one listens, it's all about personal preference. Not this game is better then that.
MAG and MW2 offer to completely different experiences, at the end of the day it all boils down to which one do you prefer more.
Same thing in the other abomination of a thread Killzone or Halo. When to games are going for to different audiences they should be compared.
However every time a 360 fanboy seeing a ps3 exclusive fps they immediately think "ohhh snap they want to make a halo clone" just like every ps3 starts running off at the mouth about "OMGZ IT BETTER THAN TEH HALOZ" letting their own personal preference and fanboyism from seeing these really aren't games that should be compared, halo cannot provide a killzone experience, just like killzone will never provide a halo experience, this doesn't mean one game is better, it's just what you prefer.
and and to the "lookz at mah sales" guys, easy shit always does way better than hard shit" FACT, selling 10 million to an existing 8 million install base is like kinda no brainer.
to me I prefer MAG over MW2 because I love the experience in MAG, it doesn't make MAG better than MW2, just a different game that I like, sadly though mag only sold what 300k, and MW2 is at like 10 billion, and since sales indicate quality these , obviously I'm a sony fanboy, and don't know quality, and MW2 is way better than MAG.