By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Pachter Predicts Motion Control Winner!

Seece said:
vaio said:
Seece said:
vaio said:
Seece said:
vaio said:
Seece said:
"I think that those who fell outraged by the mere mention of the Wii really need to check their emotional response instinct."

If you're going to aim ridiculous insults at me at least have the decency to say my name.

I'm nout "outraged" by rubangs trolling, just fed up of it. Stop blowing it out of proportion.

Rubang isnt trolling youre the one trolling him and his comment

LOL, how can you "troll someones comment" go fucking learn what It means before coming at me with that.

LOL you go fucking learn you cant talk about motion controll winner without actually talk about the leader.

I don't need to, I've already explained why wii isn't relevent, but you fail to read the OP. Again go learn what it means little kid.

you failed to read my comments as I have stated that I read it. Just because he intentionally leaves the Wii out doesnt make it less relevant.

It´s like theese analists talking about whos gonna win the console wars and not mentioning the Wii, you cant talk about winning the hardware race and not include the Wii.

If he wanted to talk about motion controlls on only xbox and ps then he should have talked about motion controlls SECOND PLACE not MOTION CONTROLL WINNER.

you see the difference?

 

Wow, then you didn't read the OP did you? Cos despite the title this isn't about who's going to win the HW war or the motion wars, it's about who's going to come out on top BETWEEN Microsoft and Sony.

Go read the OP and go learn what trolling means. Seriously.

Seriously you have a reading comprehension problem when it comes to my posts?

here i copy and paste what i wrote:

1.Just because he intentionally leaves the Wii out doesnt make it less relevant.

2.It´s like theese analists talking about whos gonna win the console wars and not mentioning the Wii, you cant talk about winning the hardware race and not include the Wii.

AND

3.If he wanted to talk about motion controlls on only xbox and ps then he should have talked about motion controlls SECOND PLACE not MOTION CONTROLL WINNER.

Its not that hard to understand if you actually read it.

Edit:

Oh and troll & trolling= an internet term for a person who willfully, through obscene, offensive or hateful actions (a.k.a. "trolling"), attempts to disrupt a community or garner reactions, attention and controversy.

wich fits perfecly with what you are doing in this thread (you willfully attempt to disrupt for gamer reactions in this case rubangs comment and other wii users in this thread)

it seems your knowledge of youre own mother language are at pathetic levels so you seem too need to go back to school again.

and also this kind of behaviour from a contributer is and should be unacceptable.

Just because he intentionally leaves the Wii out doesnt make it less relevant.


Vaio - "Bury me at Milanello"      R.I.P AC Milan

In the 60's, people took acid to make the world weird.
Now the world is weird  and people take Prozac  to make it normal.

If laughing is the best medicine and marijuana makes you laugh

Is marijuana the best medicine?

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."

“If any creator has not played Mario, then they’re probably not a good creator. That’s something I can say with 100 percent confidence. Mario is, for game creators, the development bible.

Around the Network
vaio said:
Seece said:
vaio said:
Seece said:

I don't need to, I've already explained why wii isn't relevent, but you fail to read the OP. Again go learn what it means little kid.

you failed to read my comments as I have stated that I read it. Just because he intentionally leaves the Wii out doesnt make it less relevant.

It´s like theese analists talking about whos gonna win the console wars and not mentioning the Wii, you cant talk about winning the hardware race and not include the Wii.

If he wanted to talk about motion controlls on only xbox and ps then he should have talked about motion controlls SECOND PLACE not MOTION CONTROLL WINNER.

you see the difference?

 

Wow, then you didn't read the OP did you? Cos despite the title this isn't about who's going to win the HW war or the motion wars, it's about who's going to come out on top BETWEEN Microsoft and Sony.

Go read the OP and go learn what trolling means. Seriously.

Seriously you have a reading comprehension problem when it comes to my posts?

here i copy and paste what i wrote:

1.Just because he intentionally leaves the Wii out doesnt make it less relevant.

2.It´s like theese analists talking about whos gonna win the console wars and not mentioning the Wii, you cant talk about winning the hardware race and not include the Wii.

AND

3.If he wanted to talk about motion controlls on only xbox and ps then he should have talked about motion controlls SECOND PLACE not MOTION CONTROLL WINNER.

Its not that hard to understand if you actually read it.

 

Just because he intentionally leaves the Wii out doesnt make it less relevant.

ugh, no I read your comment fine, This isn't about coming 1st or 2nd, it's PS3 VS 360!

I understand what you're saying, and I already addressed that, you're just mimicing me and coming out with crap.



 

Seece said:
vaio said:
Seece said:
vaio said:
Seece said:

I don't need to, I've already explained why wii isn't relevent, but you fail to read the OP. Again go learn what it means little kid.

you failed to read my comments as I have stated that I read it. Just because he intentionally leaves the Wii out doesnt make it less relevant.

It´s like theese analists talking about whos gonna win the console wars and not mentioning the Wii, you cant talk about winning the hardware race and not include the Wii.

If he wanted to talk about motion controlls on only xbox and ps then he should have talked about motion controlls SECOND PLACE not MOTION CONTROLL WINNER.

you see the difference?

 

Wow, then you didn't read the OP did you? Cos despite the title this isn't about who's going to win the HW war or the motion wars, it's about who's going to come out on top BETWEEN Microsoft and Sony.

Go read the OP and go learn what trolling means. Seriously.

Seriously you have a reading comprehension problem when it comes to my posts?

here i copy and paste what i wrote:

1.Just because he intentionally leaves the Wii out doesnt make it less relevant.

2.It´s like theese analists talking about whos gonna win the console wars and not mentioning the Wii, you cant talk about winning the hardware race and not include the Wii.

AND

3.If he wanted to talk about motion controlls on only xbox and ps then he should have talked about motion controlls SECOND PLACE not MOTION CONTROLL WINNER.

Its not that hard to understand if you actually read it.

 

Just because he intentionally leaves the Wii out doesnt make it less relevant.

ugh, no I read your comment fine, This isn't about coming 1st or 2nd, it's PS3 VS 360!

I understand what you're saying, and I already addressed that, you're just mimicing me and coming out with crap.

you cant be talking about winner without including the wii simple as that, if he didnt leave out the wii intentionaly then he should have worded the title different as long as the title is what it is the only conclusion is that he willfully left out the wii.

Another reason why he could have left out the Wii is that his reasoning around the pricing goes out the window when Wii is included.

Wich of the reasons he actually acted on will never be known to either of us.



Vaio - "Bury me at Milanello"      R.I.P AC Milan

In the 60's, people took acid to make the world weird.
Now the world is weird  and people take Prozac  to make it normal.

If laughing is the best medicine and marijuana makes you laugh

Is marijuana the best medicine?

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."

“If any creator has not played Mario, then they’re probably not a good creator. That’s something I can say with 100 percent confidence. Mario is, for game creators, the development bible.

vaio said:
Seece said:
vaio said:
Seece said:
vaio said:
Seece said:

I don't need to, I've already explained why wii isn't relevent, but you fail to read the OP. Again go learn what it means little kid.

you failed to read my comments as I have stated that I read it. Just because he intentionally leaves the Wii out doesnt make it less relevant.

It´s like theese analists talking about whos gonna win the console wars and not mentioning the Wii, you cant talk about winning the hardware race and not include the Wii.

If he wanted to talk about motion controlls on only xbox and ps then he should have talked about motion controlls SECOND PLACE not MOTION CONTROLL WINNER.

you see the difference?

 

Wow, then you didn't read the OP did you? Cos despite the title this isn't about who's going to win the HW war or the motion wars, it's about who's going to come out on top BETWEEN Microsoft and Sony.

Go read the OP and go learn what trolling means. Seriously.

Seriously you have a reading comprehension problem when it comes to my posts?

here i copy and paste what i wrote:

1.Just because he intentionally leaves the Wii out doesnt make it less relevant.

2.It´s like theese analists talking about whos gonna win the console wars and not mentioning the Wii, you cant talk about winning the hardware race and not include the Wii.

AND

3.If he wanted to talk about motion controlls on only xbox and ps then he should have talked about motion controlls SECOND PLACE not MOTION CONTROLL WINNER.

Its not that hard to understand if you actually read it.

 

Just because he intentionally leaves the Wii out doesnt make it less relevant.

ugh, no I read your comment fine, This isn't about coming 1st or 2nd, it's PS3 VS 360!

I understand what you're saying, and I already addressed that, you're just mimicing me and coming out with crap.

you cant be talking about winner without including the wii simple as that, if he didnt leave out the wii intentionaly then he should have worded the title different as long as the title is what it is the only conclusion is that he willfully left out the wii.

Another reason why he could have left out the Wii is that his reasoning around the pricing goes out the window when Wii is included.

Wich of the reasons he actually acted on will never be known to either of us.

Yes you can actually, yet you and the wii fans here fail to see that. It's not the winner of the motion wars, it's the winner between 360 and PS3. and there will be one, he isn't saying the Wii hasn't one, he isn't mentioning it because it's completly irrelvent to the discussion.

Until you understand this entire thread is about 360 vs PS3 and who will win BETWEEN THEM, then you're gonna carry on with this very annoying "Waaaaaaa wii deserves a mention" attitude. Completly childish and annoying, know whats worse than a sore loser? a sore winner.



 

The only impression I'm getting from this thread is that people don't want the Wii brought in because it's 67m units ahead. It's inevitable that the Wii will be brought into such a topic as it's the target for which they're aiming for, I honestly don't see the problem as rather then discussing it in a debate and drawing comparisons here and there between the new MCs and the Wii to further the discussion I see people raging and calling people trolls. I assume it's because in a topic like this it's the PS3/360 who are new to the game and playing catch up so they can't bash the Wii but rather the users who bring it up, debates progress and new elements are brought in to further discussions so if you don't like someone else drawing a comparison just ignore the post.



Around the Network
Wyrdness said:
The only impression I'm getting from this thread is that people don't want the Wii brought in because it's 67m units ahead. It's inevitable that the Wii will be brought into such a topic as it's the target for which they're aiming for, I honestly don't see the problem as rather then discussing it in a debate and drawing comparisons here and there between the new MCs and the Wii to further the discussion I see people raging and calling people trolls. I assume it's because in a topic like this it's the PS3/360 who are new to the game and playing catch up so they can't bash the Wii but rather the users who bring it up, debates progress and new elements are brought in to further discussions so if you don't like someone else drawing a comparison just ignore the post.

No not at all, my beef is with rubang coming into a PS3 vs £60 thread basically saying "Wii is in first place, the others don't matter" It's trolling and it's flamebait, and this is one of the few Natal vs Arc threads that would have been nice if wii fans didn't come in, because you know what? most people interested in Natal and Arc on this site arnt interested in the wii, I don't wanna have to talk about the wii everytime I come into a natal thread, it's getting REALLY boring.



 

"The key to success with a retrofitted motion controller is penetration"

the only one that can penetrate is arc and wii mote so its between those two if you use patchers theory



                                                             

                                                                      Play Me

Seece said:
vaio said:
Seece said:
vaio said:
Seece said:
vaio said:
Seece said:

I don't need to, I've already explained why wii isn't relevent, but you fail to read the OP. Again go learn what it means little kid.

you failed to read my comments as I have stated that I read it. Just because he intentionally leaves the Wii out doesnt make it less relevant.

It´s like theese analists talking about whos gonna win the console wars and not mentioning the Wii, you cant talk about winning the hardware race and not include the Wii.

If he wanted to talk about motion controlls on only xbox and ps then he should have talked about motion controlls SECOND PLACE not MOTION CONTROLL WINNER.

you see the difference?

 

Wow, then you didn't read the OP did you? Cos despite the title this isn't about who's going to win the HW war or the motion wars, it's about who's going to come out on top BETWEEN Microsoft and Sony.

Go read the OP and go learn what trolling means. Seriously.

Seriously you have a reading comprehension problem when it comes to my posts?

here i copy and paste what i wrote:

1.Just because he intentionally leaves the Wii out doesnt make it less relevant.

2.It´s like theese analists talking about whos gonna win the console wars and not mentioning the Wii, you cant talk about winning the hardware race and not include the Wii.

AND

3.If he wanted to talk about motion controlls on only xbox and ps then he should have talked about motion controlls SECOND PLACE not MOTION CONTROLL WINNER.

Its not that hard to understand if you actually read it.

 

Just because he intentionally leaves the Wii out doesnt make it less relevant.

ugh, no I read your comment fine, This isn't about coming 1st or 2nd, it's PS3 VS 360!

I understand what you're saying, and I already addressed that, you're just mimicing me and coming out with crap.

you cant be talking about winner without including the wii simple as that, if he didnt leave out the wii intentionaly then he should have worded the title different as long as the title is what it is the only conclusion is that he willfully left out the wii.

Another reason why he could have left out the Wii is that his reasoning around the pricing goes out the window when Wii is included.

Wich of the reasons he actually acted on will never be known to either of us.

Yes you can actually, yet you and the wii fans here fail to see that. It's not the winner of the motion wars, it's the winner between 360 and PS3. and there will be one, he isn't saying the Wii hasn't one, he isn't mentioning it because it's completly irrelvent to the discussion.

Until you understand this entire thread is about 360 vs PS3 and who will win BETWEEN THEM, then you're gonna carry on with this very annoying "Waaaaaaa wii deserves a mention" attitude. Completly childish and annoying, know whats worse than a sore loser? a sore winner.

I never said it deserves mentioning I said you cant talk about winners without including the Wii and the reason he isnt mentioning one is because

1. he intenrionally ignores it

2. It kills his price argument

3 both the above

The whole reason there is a motion controlls war between the 2 (actually all three) is because of the Wii and thus you cant have this topic without the mentioning of said console.

you need to accept the wii exists and is the reason this topic exists and is actually Winning the motion contoll wars wich this is about.

As I said before just because he intentionally excludes the wii doesnt make it less relevant to the topic and just because his exclusion suits your agenda it doesnt either make it right.

If you want a xbox vs ps motion contoll topic go create one your self where it states its about second place or the winner between the 2 and i will gladly participate without mentioning Wii and also give my reasons why i think natal will and should win, this topic doesnt fit under those criterias.



Vaio - "Bury me at Milanello"      R.I.P AC Milan

In the 60's, people took acid to make the world weird.
Now the world is weird  and people take Prozac  to make it normal.

If laughing is the best medicine and marijuana makes you laugh

Is marijuana the best medicine?

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."

“If any creator has not played Mario, then they’re probably not a good creator. That’s something I can say with 100 percent confidence. Mario is, for game creators, the development bible.

BHR-3 said:
"The key to success with a retrofitted motion controller is penetration"

the only one that can penetrate is arc and wii mote so its between those two if you use patchers theory

I really hope you're being sarcastic lol



 

vaio said:
Seece said:
vaio said:
Seece said:
vaio said:
Seece said:
vaio said:
Seece said:

I don't need to, I've already explained why wii isn't relevent, but you fail to read the OP. Again go learn what it means little kid.

you failed to read my comments as I have stated that I read it. Just because he intentionally leaves the Wii out doesnt make it less relevant.

It´s like theese analists talking about whos gonna win the console wars and not mentioning the Wii, you cant talk about winning the hardware race and not include the Wii.

If he wanted to talk about motion controlls on only xbox and ps then he should have talked about motion controlls SECOND PLACE not MOTION CONTROLL WINNER.

you see the difference?

 

Wow, then you didn't read the OP did you? Cos despite the title this isn't about who's going to win the HW war or the motion wars, it's about who's going to come out on top BETWEEN Microsoft and Sony.

Go read the OP and go learn what trolling means. Seriously.

Seriously you have a reading comprehension problem when it comes to my posts?

here i copy and paste what i wrote:

1.Just because he intentionally leaves the Wii out doesnt make it less relevant.

2.It´s like theese analists talking about whos gonna win the console wars and not mentioning the Wii, you cant talk about winning the hardware race and not include the Wii.

AND

3.If he wanted to talk about motion controlls on only xbox and ps then he should have talked about motion controlls SECOND PLACE not MOTION CONTROLL WINNER.

Its not that hard to understand if you actually read it.

 

Just because he intentionally leaves the Wii out doesnt make it less relevant.

ugh, no I read your comment fine, This isn't about coming 1st or 2nd, it's PS3 VS 360!

I understand what you're saying, and I already addressed that, you're just mimicing me and coming out with crap.

you cant be talking about winner without including the wii simple as that, if he didnt leave out the wii intentionaly then he should have worded the title different as long as the title is what it is the only conclusion is that he willfully left out the wii.

Another reason why he could have left out the Wii is that his reasoning around the pricing goes out the window when Wii is included.

Wich of the reasons he actually acted on will never be known to either of us.

Yes you can actually, yet you and the wii fans here fail to see that. It's not the winner of the motion wars, it's the winner between 360 and PS3. and there will be one, he isn't saying the Wii hasn't one, he isn't mentioning it because it's completly irrelvent to the discussion.

Until you understand this entire thread is about 360 vs PS3 and who will win BETWEEN THEM, then you're gonna carry on with this very annoying "Waaaaaaa wii deserves a mention" attitude. Completly childish and annoying, know whats worse than a sore loser? a sore winner.

I never said it deserves mentioning I said you cant talk about winners without including the Wii and the reason he isnt mentioning one is because

1. he intenrionally ignores it

2. It kills his price argument

3 both the above

The whole reason there is a motion controlls war between the 2 (actually all three) is because of the Wii and thus you cant have this topic without the mentioning of said console.

you need to accept the wii exists and is the reason this topic exists and is actually Winning the motion contoll wars wich this is about.

As I said before just because he intentionally excludes the wii doesnt make it less relevant to the topic and just because his exclusion suits your agenda it doesnt either make it right.

If you want a xbox vs ps motion contoll topic go create one your self where it states its about second place or the winner between the 2 and i will gladly participate without mentioning Wii and also give my reasons why i think natal will and should win, this topic doesnt fit under those criterias.

We're going to have to agree to disagree, the wii has no place in this discussion and this is about the winner between Arc vs Natal not overall motion controller winner. Anyone can see that except for a few wii fans that want to gloat in this thread.