But but Pc is cheaper, but but Pc is the master race but but Pc must and is always infinitely better than consoles.
#Ps4masterrace
( At those people that are going to bring up the frame rate difference, tell me when most of the so-called Pc master race have computers with these specifications and that doesn't cost more than a PS4:
Intel CPU Core i7 3770 3,4 GHz or
AMD CPU AMD FX-8350 4 GHz
Nvidia GPU GeForce GTX 770 or
AMD GPU Radeon R9 290
RAM 8GB )
Please don't take this as offensive. This is probably the only time a console owner can feel as if he has a copy which is equall to that of the PC version, in terms of graphics.
User moderated for this post -RavenXtra
Well, they both look equally horrible. At least you can help yourself with higher resolution and fps on PC.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.
| Mr.Playstation said: But but Pc is cheaper, but but Pc is the master race but but Pc must and is always infinitely better than consoles. #Ps4masterrace ( At those people that are going to bring up the frame rate difference, tell me when most of the so-called Pc master race have computers with these specifications and that doesn't cost more than a PS4: Intel CPU Core i7 3770 3,4 GHz or AMD CPU AMD FX-8350 4 GHz Nvidia GPU GeForce GTX 770 or AMD GPU Radeon R9 290 RAM 8GB ) |
Why would I limit myself with money when I want to have the best quality?
More money spent -> more quality product. Shocker, I know.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.
there is a slight barely noticeable difference in texture quality. by that i mean you would need to be looking at it from that closely in splitscreen comparison to notice. during normal gameplay you would not even see it.
the only considerable thing is the tree and grass density which is no big deal.
and DAMN are people critical. the comment section on that video is a hate fest and the game looks great.
vivster said:
Why would I limit myself with money when I want to have the best quality? More money spent -> more quality product. Shocker, I know. |
Yet Pc gamers still want to debate that a PC build can be cheaper. A Pc has it's advantages ( and lots of them ) but price isn't one if you REALLY want the best graphical experiances.
| shikamaru317 said: Eh, Youtube compression is so bad you can't tell much of a difference even if there is one. Obviously the hair from Nvidia hairworks is better, and I see a few other improvements on PC. A few days ago I saw some 4k PC screenshots downscaled to 1080p compared agaisnt the PS4 version. There was a noticeable improvement imo, but I'm not sure how a direct 1080p comparison would look. I eagerly await Digital Foundry's technical review of Witcher 3. |
The ps4 could easily render the same hair animation by using the gpu, bloodborne has plenty of such gpu heavy hair and leaf effects and looks better than the witcher 3 on ps4
more foliage and slightly better grass.... main differnces (slightly better hair on the horse (only thing its really noticable on)).
Apart from that.... cant really spot much of anything, that really stands out.
Basically PS4 version look nearly identical to PC ultra version.
What is telling is that there is barely a difference between medium PC setting and PS4 as wel. So what does that tell us here?
Double post
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
Currently Online 
