I looked at two of them and id say ps3 looks more detailed, however these are shit shots. They dont even look as good as what im seing playing the actual game

Looks at OP's name...Derives "PS3" as winner from thisn "unbiased" posting history.

In fairness the PS3 demo looks better but it really is a wash and this is a demo for a game that's not out for ages and from a later build than the 360.

Respect to PullusPardus for pointing that out.

Hence the reason why i made it clear that it was a demo. I could have been a douche and just said Lost planet 2 ps3 vs 360. But i didnt, Everyone on this site is informed enough to know that the PS3 demo released after the 360.

And whats about me name???? What about me post history? And you can clearly tell that i was joking when i declared a winner. Maybe i should edit my op because sarcasm doesnt translate well over the interweb

I'm not going to say which one looks better but the 360 version looks better.

They both look great. I thought the monster looked better in the 360 version than PS3 but the guy looked better in the PS3 version. They're pretty much the same IMO and if either side (360 or PS3) says there's is the absolute winner it isn't by much. Neither console completely shows off its power and forms an excuse to get that version.

I didn't like the demo.

OP is unreadable for me but I'm not too fussed on comparing different builds anyway. I don't think the OP was trolling either tbh, he did state it was based on demo's and didn't go into great detail about the differences which to me signified he wasn't drawing too many conclusions.

The threads are always almost the same too, so there's a nice symetry of topic and discussion.

As ever they look pretty similar to me, with the usual differences due to the different rendering approachs of each console.  Amazing,

Neva did i. I the contrast put me off and the gameplay was meh. The creatures and enviroments were crap aswell

there both winners ;) the only console that looses is the wii as it can't play it