Ruler said:
The oppsite of Anarcho Communism is Anarcho Capitalism or Libertarianism. The political compass, an image by them Georges Sorel wasnt a marxist or fascist, he only influed some of them. I dont see how Syndicalism proofs anything as the DPRK is state to begin with, the whole Syndicalist ideology is based on some form anarchism doesnt have to say which version, left or right. Syndicalism isnt really considred even communism by many, in fact Anarchist communism isnt even Marxist-Leninist which the DPRK is. You just added it in there to find something to link the DPRK to Fascism.
I could say the same thing about the US. You would think they are the most secure nation geographically, economicley and militarily yet they have to constantly meddling in everyones affairs and fear mongering its population 24 hours a day. In its past 70 years the DPRK never was involved in any war unlike the US. The US and other first world countries can afford democracies and some form of human rights because they can export their exploitation abroud trough imperialism like global trade. If they would be cut off from trade with poorer countries they would be just as cruel as the DPRK or any third world country to its population, like forcing their people to work in coal mines with bad condition etc. as someone would need to do the dirty work. |
You may want to take another look at your graph there and Sorel not a Marxist? You may want to check that.
Let's break this down. First, syndicalism as anarcho-communism is your argument, not mine. Secondly, I highlighted that the economics of NK is the weakness of my argument, your assertion here is ridiculous. Third, I did not connect NK to syndicalism and this was already made clear to you in my previous replies.
"I could say the same thing about the US." Absolutely not, be serious here. However you did prove my point here, without the US then the NK regime would not be able to justify it's crimes.