Ummm....
Oblivion, wait, that wouldn't work out?
Oh!
Freedom Fighters...
If anyone doesn't know, it's a third-person shooter.
It was an excellent game, great reviews, but EXTREMELY SHORT.
If it had online, things would have been way better for the game!
Full Castlevania co-op...
*shivers at the very thought*
My themeforest portfolio:
| routsounmanman said: Full Castlevania co-op... *shivers at the very thought* |
If it was done right it would be great. I totally agree w/ you.
PLAYSTATON NETWORK: BLOODLINEZ
Destruction Derby
20 players, one massive arena or race...perfect. (unless we've had one?)
Hmm, pie.
| Gnizmo said: Not all games should have online. Games that are mostly single player and don't lend themselves well to online play should not force it. Mario and Zelda games don't translate well into online because ithey aren't designed for it. Mario games are just platformers and that works best when you are working alone. Zelda games are about puzzle solving, and even the boss fights rely more on figuring out how to kill the boss rather than just killing them. Combat is very much secondary. Development resources are not infinite. Tacking on online for the sake of saying it has it will hurt a game more than help it. Perfect the game and if it lends itself well to online then include it. Forcing it will just reduce the quality of the best part of the game. |
I totally agree with you. The Bioshock team specifically stated that they weren't including a multiplayer mode because they wanted to focus entirely on the single-player aspect of the game. I actually think the industry trend has been moving too far into the multiplayer-focused realm; I don't like how many people seem to think that if a game doesn't have online multiplayer, it isn't worth playing.
Of course, there are certainly examples of games that SHOULD have online multiplayer that don't, particularly in the case of the already-mentioned Worms game for the Wii. In fact, that's just plain inexcusable.
It would be nice if a game that already has multiplayer functionality expanded that area to include online capabilities, but I don't think it's necessary for games to shoehorn in multiplayer modes simply for the sake of having them.
|
Hates Nomura. Tagged: GooseGaws - <--- Has better taste in games than you. |
 |
oblivion ( mentioned a few times above ) but that should be a MMORPG
"I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007
Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions
Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.
I think it be cool to have like a GTA online with a sorta of MMO idea to it. How cool would it be just chillen down the street and then all of a sudden see some car hauling ass down the street with 20 cops on his ass? Or maybe your doing your own thing, driving down the street, then get hit by a stray tank shell from a fire fight between the Army and some guy with 6 stars. I think it would be pretty cool, make for like a crazy hectic world.
@GooseGaws
APB? neverheard of it, is a PC game?
EDIT: Nevermind, just looked up the game.
online coop for Pixeljunk Monsters
better online for Calling all Cars, if this game had leaderboards and stats people would actually still play it
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
