By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Peter Molyneux #44 on Time 100 list

stika said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
sounds like MS paying off certain ppl to build hype for Natal than anything else

ah yes the usual PS3 fanboy defense "microsoft payed for it"

so what does that make you? MS employee? :P grow up...and stop wth the immature fanboy comments

 

Please do validate the reason why he is on the list...over a product that's not even out yet....when there are so many people around the world that deserves nominations that aren't even mentioned...I just do not see a reason why.



In-Kat-We-Trust Brigade!

"This world is Merciless, and it's also very beautiful"

For All News/Info related to the PlayStation Vita, Come and join us in the Official PSV Thread!

Around the Network
M.U.G.E.N said:

so what does that make you? MS employee? :P grow up...and stop wth the immature fanboy comments

 

Please do validate the reason why he is on the list...over a product that's not even out yet....when there are so many people around the world that deserves nominations that aren't even mentioned...I just do not see a reason why.

What does it matter anyway?  1 week after the issue releases, no one will give a shit.



M.U.G.E.N said:
stika said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
sounds like MS paying off certain ppl to build hype for Natal than anything else

ah yes the usual PS3 fanboy defense "microsoft payed for it"

so what does that make you? MS employee? :P grow up...and stop wth the immature fanboy comments

 

Please do validate the reason why he is on the list...over a product that's not even out yet....when there are so many people around the world that deserves nominations that aren't even mentioned...I just do not see a reason why.

a MS employee? I never defended or attacked Molyneyx's position in the list. Why is Lady Gaga there? Did she pay for it? What about Jay Leno?

 

Why should I have to validate the reason for him to be there? Last time I checked I don't work for time magazine but neither do I  feel the need to display my ignorance and say that microsoft or anyone else bought their candidacy.

 

 



stika said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
stika said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
sounds like MS paying off certain ppl to build hype for Natal than anything else

ah yes the usual PS3 fanboy defense "microsoft payed for it"

so what does that make you? MS employee? :P grow up...and stop wth the immature fanboy comments

 

Please do validate the reason why he is on the list...over a product that's not even out yet....when there are so many people around the world that deserves nominations that aren't even mentioned...I just do not see a reason why.

a MS employee? I never defended or attacked Molyneyx's position in the list. Why is Lady Gaga there? Did she pay for it? What about Jay Leno?

 

Why should I have to validate the reason for him to be there? Last time I checked I don't work for time magazine but neither do I  feel the need to display my ignorance and say that microsoft or anyone else bought their candidacy.

 

 

if you don't care or don't have any facts to back up ANY claim then why the hell are you in this thread? Why point the finger at me and say I'm a fanboy when I point out a 'possibility'....

 

This is a discussion thread, unless you can't keep it civil and not resort to immature fanboy comments then gtfo

 

And yes this thread IS about him being in the list...so that's what I will talk about...if you got an issue with what I say, please give the reason why I 'might' be wrong

Time gave Natal one of the best inventions (I think it was last year or so) when it wasn't even in it's final stage. Moly is getting a nomination for something that isn't finished even..heck the Milo thread shown to the public at first was a complete misleading BS

The impact a large corporation as MS can have on a magazine article is obvious...if you think it's not a possibility your being naive...it's like saying smallville producers stumbled upon Natal to include it in the shows episode or Ipad being on Modern Families episode etc. It's just how this works

Either way I'm not gonna continue this useless argument with you anymore...I avoid immature discussions with people who resort to name calling rather than using facts/stats/predictions/guestimates etc....



In-Kat-We-Trust Brigade!

"This world is Merciless, and it's also very beautiful"

For All News/Info related to the PlayStation Vita, Come and join us in the Official PSV Thread!

stika said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
stika said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
sounds like MS paying off certain ppl to build hype for Natal than anything else

ah yes the usual PS3 fanboy defense "microsoft payed for it"

so what does that make you? MS employee? :P grow up...and stop wth the immature fanboy comments

 

Please do validate the reason why he is on the list...over a product that's not even out yet....when there are so many people around the world that deserves nominations that aren't even mentioned...I just do not see a reason why.

a MS employee? I never defended or attacked Molyneyx's position in the list. Why is Lady Gaga there? Did she pay for it? What about Jay Leno?

 

Why should I have to validate the reason for him to be there? Last time I checked I don't work for time magazine but neither do I  feel the need to display my ignorance and say that microsoft or anyone else bought their candidacy.

 

 

if you don't care or don't have any facts to back up ANY claim then why the hell are you in this thread? Why point the finger at me and say I'm a fanboy when I point out a 'possibility'....

 

This is a discussion thread, unless you can't keep it civil and not resort to immature fanboy comments then gtfo

 

And yes this thread IS about him being in the list...so that's what I will talk about...if you got an issue with what I say, please give the reason why I 'might' be wrong

Time gave Natal one of the best inventions (I think it was last year or so) when it wasn't even in it's final stage. Moly is getting a nomination for something that isn't finished even..heck the Milo thread shown to the public at first was a complete misleading BS

The impact a large corporation as MS can have on a magazine article is obvious...if you think it's not a possibility your being naive...it's like saying smallville producers stumbled upon Natal to include it in the shows episode or Ipad being on Modern Families episode etc. It's just how this works

Either way I'm not gonna continue this useless argument with you anymore...I avoid immature discussions with people who resort to name calling rather than using facts/stats/predictions/guestimates etc....



In-Kat-We-Trust Brigade!

"This world is Merciless, and it's also very beautiful"

For All News/Info related to the PlayStation Vita, Come and join us in the Official PSV Thread!

Around the Network
stika said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
stika said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
sounds like MS paying off certain ppl to build hype for Natal than anything else

ah yes the usual PS3 fanboy defense "microsoft payed for it"

so what does that make you? MS employee? :P grow up...and stop wth the immature fanboy comments

 

Please do validate the reason why he is on the list...over a product that's not even out yet....when there are so many people around the world that deserves nominations that aren't even mentioned...I just do not see a reason why.

a MS employee? I never defended or attacked Molyneyx's position in the list. Why is Lady Gaga there? Did she pay for it? What about Jay Leno?

 

Why should I have to validate the reason for him to be there? Last time I checked I don't work for time magazine but neither do I  feel the need to display my ignorance and say that microsoft or anyone else bought their candidacy.

 

 

Of course Microsoft payed for natal in smallville. but frankly comparing that to a place in time Magazine is beyond ridiculous. They are two completly things, it's like saying sony payed for all uncharted 2's GOTY awards because we saw some ads on TV

 

  This is a discussion thread yes, but after watching the entire list of candidates making an accusation liek that based on nothing but your imagination is really just an attempt at flamming.

I find it hilarious that you even have the nerve to call me "imature", i'm simply using logic, you're just trying to be "cool"

By the way, Calling me a Microsoft employee isn't childish in way, shape or form now is it?

Saying "they bribed them" jsut because you don't agree with something, isn't childish in any way shape or form.

If you're going to make a claim, at LEAST back it up

 

It's not like I need to go any further then your wall posts to see that you live for these kinds of discussions.