stika said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
stika said:
M.U.G.E.N said: sounds like MS paying off certain ppl to build hype for Natal than anything else |
ah yes the usual PS3 fanboy defense "microsoft payed for it"
|
so what does that make you? MS employee? :P grow up...and stop wth the immature fanboy comments
Please do validate the reason why he is on the list...over a product that's not even out yet....when there are so many people around the world that deserves nominations that aren't even mentioned...I just do not see a reason why.
|
a MS employee? I never defended or attacked Molyneyx's position in the list. Why is Lady Gaga there? Did she pay for it? What about Jay Leno?
Why should I have to validate the reason for him to be there? Last time I checked I don't work for time magazine but neither do I feel the need to display my ignorance and say that microsoft or anyone else bought their candidacy.
|
Of course Microsoft payed for natal in smallville. but frankly comparing that to a place in time Magazine is beyond ridiculous. They are two completly things, it's like saying sony payed for all uncharted 2's GOTY awards because we saw some ads on TV
This is a discussion thread yes, but after watching the entire list of candidates making an accusation liek that based on nothing but your imagination is really just an attempt at flamming.
I find it hilarious that you even have the nerve to call me "imature", i'm simply using logic, you're just trying to be "cool"
By the way, Calling me a Microsoft employee isn't childish in way, shape or form now is it?
Saying "they bribed them" jsut because you don't agree with something, isn't childish in any way shape or form.
If you're going to make a claim, at LEAST back it up
It's not like I need to go any further then your wall posts to see that you live for these kinds of discussions.