Quantcast
Mazty's Activity
Mazty

    7,730

    L5: Zergling (2,270 until level 6)
    Mazty #flush as fuck
    • A male gamer
    • United Kingdom
    • Joined on August 29th 2009, last online on 27 April 2017.
    • Profile Views: 17,762
    • Forum posts: 1,951 times which averages 1 posts per day
    • User Reviews: 0 reviews
    •   VG$ 1,750.00
    Banned (Expires: 9th Jul 10)
    Permaban - Flaming (Frankly, we're just tired of your attitude towards the moderation team and your lack of respect for users on the site. ) ~ axumblade [5351116]

    Badges: (view all)

    Everything's Falling Into Place Add a total of 100 games to your collection.
    50 in One Add a total of 50 games to your collection.
    The Nuts & Bolts Add a total of 25 games to your collection.
    One Piece at a Time Add your first game to your collection.
    Open For Business Earned 10 badges.
    Hit And Run 15 comments posted on VGChartz news articles.
    Trust Me, It'll Have Legs 100 replies made to user's most popular thread.
    Watch Your Back! Received 10,000 profile views.
    Pata 100 wall post comments made on gamrConnect.
    Littlest Genocide 1,000 posts on the gamrConnect forums.
    2 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 2 years.
    Leaving Limbo 100 posts on the gamrConnect forums.
    1st Birthday Has been a VGChartz member for over 1 year.
    So You Came Back For More, Huh? Logged in a second time.

    Activity

    < 1 - 16 of 16 <
    • x
      < Mazty posted something on 007BondAgent's wall

      A pot shot about the wii u in a thread about a game not being released for the wii u..,...lol the moderation here is going to hell. Maybe they want to ban everyone for summer?

      x
      at this rate, i won't be here in the summer lol

      on 05 May 2013

    • x
      < Mazty posted something on sethnintendo's wall

      lawl lawl lawl

    • x
      < Mazty and CGI-Quality are now friends.
    • x
      < Mazty posted something on Captain_Tom's wall

      I notice you are using an "awesome little case" - what case are you using?

    • x
      < Mazty posted something on happydolphin's wall

      Hey dude, you still into stocks & shares? Just wondering if you know any good places to start with investing in shares/what traders to use?

      x
      Hey man, just got this. To be totally honest I stop following a few months back. I would recommend visiting Ail's wall or in the vgstockz thread, he usually always answers there.

      Just make the comment to his name ("@Ail").

      gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php" target="_blank" class="link">http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=139987

      on 26 March 2013

    • x
      < Mazty and CGI-Quality are now friends.
    • x
      < Mazty posted something on NintendoPie's wall

      You've never addressed my posts once. If you had, you'd of commented on what was wrong with my posts. At the moment you just don't like me speaking my mind rather than addressing the content. That's an ad hominem as you're attacking me, not the content of my posts. Not cool bro -_-

      I'm a realist with a good idea of market analysis. Check my sig.
      Do I dislike Nintendo? No, I loved the N64, wasted many hours away on it. Was I a fan of the wii? Nope. The Wii U? Can't see the point of it. But that's not to say I dislike Nintendo - I'm a PC gamer & not some rabid fanboy out on a quest to destroy companies.

      If you don't like hearing my point of view, then deal with it maturely instead of leaving petty remarks.

      x
      I'm not attacking you. I'm "attacking" the way you try to discuss with people.

      You say that you are a realist. Cool, fine. But I think there's a point where you start to cross from being "real" to being negative or condescending. Maybe you just see yourself as speaking the truth, but others (not everyone) see it as you attacking something with no warrant or reasoning. You, most of the times I see you post, seem to have some type of agenda. You seem to always go after something by it's every move. (Just like with the Wii U.)

      That last sentence leaves me to believe that you have some sort of complex. Petty Remarks? I didn't do that. Immature discussion? I didn't do that either. I clearly remember me replying to you with a simple discussion on how HandHelds tie in with Home Consoles. Then all of the sudden you spiraled that out of control and started being very difficult to talk to. You started being extremely sarcastic and then acted as if I didn't tell you why I didn't want to talk to you anymore about the subject. (When, in fact, I had told you why. I told you that you were being difficult due to being extremely sarcastic.)

      I'm not trying to say all of your discussions are pointless and just straight out attacks on something. I've seen very good points from you that I have taken into consideration. (I'm also not trying to say that I'm perfect in discussions because you're right, I'm not. You are also right that I haven't graduated HS. I'm only 14, after all.) Don't take what I said to you as a full on full attack on you. It's not.

      on 17 March 2013

      x
      I'll go on record here and say that I've a degree; if people don't like how I discuss topics they need to take it up with the scientific method, not me, as that's how I try to debate things - logically & rationally.

      If people see honesty as aggression, I shouldn't be held accountable for other peoples hostile reactions to reasonable opinions.

      When I pointed out the logical failings of your argument with handhelds, you just dismissed it with the arbitrary justification of "no one does that" which is a fallacy (appeal to the masses) and then refused to discuss it any further. Not being able to see errors in arguments when fallacies are used, is not engaging in a mature debate. As you're 14 it's understandable as it's a complex concept and will just take time to understand, and you've better things to be occupying your time with tbf.

      Just in the future if you see something I've written and don't agree with it, try to address the content directly and logically - try to see it as a sum, rather than opinions vs opinions.

      on 17 March 2013

    • x
    • x
      < Mazty posted something on JayWood2010's wall

      So...those links....any comments on the industry split? -.^

      x
      What are you talking about bro? Im assuming something to do with last night?

      on 06 February 2013

      x
      Don't be like that bro. You know exactly what I'm talking about unless you forgot about that thread you made:
      gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php" target="_blank" class="link">http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5097522

      on 06 February 2013

      x
      That is why I asked. I stopped going to that thread last night. I went to sleep. That won't happen again. And I stand behind what I said. Yes the WiiU will be criticised for being underpowered and that is no secret. Your ferrarri vs dodge is a poor example. you are talking about consoles that are like 50-200$ Difference compared to cars that are hundreds of thousands difference lol Lambo's vs ferrarri's is a little more accurate haha

      on 06 February 2013

      x
      So you stand by that the industry isn't split even though those links clearly shows it is. K. Reality distortion field @ 900%

      on 06 February 2013

      x
      So you think a few people is the industry split? Split would be 50/50 not 0.01 vs 99.9% I could look up online and find links that show lebron james sucks. Does that make it true? No, most likely means they just dont like lebron james.

      on 06 February 2013

      x
      And once again you are missing the point. Answer me this. Is the WiiU an upgrade to the wii? And what will the competition of the WiiU be for the majority of it's life? Answer those two questions for me and you will have your answer

      on 06 February 2013

      x
      And once again you are missing the point. Answer me this. Is the WiiU an upgrade to the wii? And what will the competition of the WiiU be for the majority of it's life? Answer those two questions for me and you will have your answer

      on 06 February 2013

      x
      Split =/= 50/50 split.
      I have shown you how the industry is split. If you want to claim otherwise then you need to find overwhelming evidence to show that it is not split. So far you have shown no evidence, but just made unsubstantiated claims.
      The competition for the Wii U will be the PS3 and 360 as it will not keep pace in the slightest with the PS4 and next-box if rumoured specs are true.

      on 06 February 2013

      x
      So specs are the cause of sales now? I dont know if you havent realized but for the last two generations the weakest console has sold the most. Wii was the weakest. And PS2 was the weakest. Both sold the most.

      on 06 February 2013

      x
      Oh and btw from your terminology you are saying the vita is last generation since it cant keep up with the 3DS. Man i could make an entire thread on how ridiculous you sound.

      on 06 February 2013

      x
      Nice, but obvious, strawman argument - no one is talking about the cause of sales. Don't digress plx.

      This is about what defines generation. You claim that the definition is solid - clearly it isn't as there is a split in the industry with regard to the Wii U. It's now up to you to show how this split does not exist, or concede that your thread wasn't correct in the assumptions made within the OP.

      on 06 February 2013

      x
      Or you could just admit you was wrong or leave me alone. I have very clearly explained this and what people are talking about when they say next-generation. They are imaginary numbers we base them off of around the world and ithe industry. Yes some people will bring up the whole power issue because yes the Wii lacked power and yes the wiiu will most likely lack power but it still falls into the 8th generation of consoles regardless of how poerful it was. it is also the next generation of nintendo. i explained both of these already yet you ignore them everytime and for what? You have gotten whiney and upset over what? Look at your thread and how many people was argueing with you. Now why was that? because they did not agree with you because you are wrong. yes some people (very few people) will say hey it isnt, but the majority knows exactly what Im talking about and why my thread went smooth until you came in. If you want to argue I want you to talk to me rationally instead of using flawed logic like a ferrari vs dodge, wii wasnt competion to 360.ps3, and the weakest consoles cant keep up. Do a little research or use common sense. One of the two. i mean seriosly? Im cool with you showing peoples comments with links but literally everything else you have said is flawed. You sound like a 14 year old kid trying to prove a point and when i didnt respond to you, then you bring it up again a day later.

      on 06 February 2013

      x
      So links showing how devs and publishers can't agree on the gen status of the Wii U shows I was wrong in stating that the industry is split over the definition how exactly?

      And I'm the one with the attitude problem. Reality Distortion Field @ 1000%

      on 06 February 2013

      x
      Idk if you think that 1000% reality distortion is funny or something but you just sound immature.

      And no it does not show that the industry is split. as i said before a few people does not = 50% It does however show a few developers being upset in the lack of power. Still does not change one thing that ive said though which for whatever reason you seem to ignore.

      Anyways Im done here.

      on 06 February 2013

      x
      I'm the one sounding immature, yet you are ignoring interviews etc.
      Lolwutbrah?

      Split does not mean it has to be 50%. That's you making up the definition of the word.

      If you don't have an open mind, is a forum really the right place for you? Pushing your version of reality onto other people is neither polite, nor reasonable.

      on 06 February 2013

      x
      read through my comments and you will see I said majority a few times. Anyways you are more than welcome to think the way you want but i will still have the majority on my side.

      on 06 February 2013

      x
      Care to back up any of your claims? Where is this "majority" you speak of? I have the majority on my side because I have evidence xD

      on 06 February 2013

    • x
      < Mazty and WagnerPaiva are now friends.
    • x
      < Mazty posted something on Vinniegambini's wall

      How was PGR3 not next gen?

      x
      Many gaming analysts and gamers stated that Xbox 360 was defined as a next-generation system when Gears of War was released. If PGR3 was your system seller for next-gen, great; however, the industry speaks otherwise.

      www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15644342/ns/technology_and_science-games/t/gears-war-next-gen-its-best/" target="_blank" class="link">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15644342/ns/technology_and_science-games/t/gears-war-next-gen-its-best/#.UOkmJKweqV4

      on 06 January 2013

      x
      That was avoiding the question. How was PGR3 not next gen?

      on 06 January 2013

      x
      You are neglecting my answer. As per the link above, the technological advancements to be so called next-gen was demonstrated on the Xbox 360 once Gears of War was released. How difficult is that to comprehend?

      on 06 January 2013

      x
      "PGR3 was not next-gen because Gears of War was next gen" isn't an answer.
      Also one review from one site is hardly compelling evidence of anything other than one persons opinion.

      www.gamerevolution.com/review/project-gotham-r" target="_blank" class="link">http://www.gamerevolution.com/review/project-gotham-r

      It is clear from the graphics in PGR3 that it is next gen.

      on 06 January 2013

    • x
      < Mazty posted something on dsgrue3's wall

      Set yourself up to fall on your on sword there bud...

    • x
      < Mazty posted something on Mr Khan's wall

      Can you do something about this guy spamming my wall: dsgrue3 ?
      Thanks,

    • x
      < Mazty posted something on Mr Khan's wall

      If quoting the ceo of Nintendo America is a magnet for thread derailment then how on earth should you post? Shouldn't you be banning the people who think they know better then Reggie?

      x
      ?

      on 07 December 2012

      x
      sigh, did not want to have this argument, but okay. It's not about quoting Reggie or not, it's just the way that you argue. It's very pedantic, and is detrimental to argument on the whole

      on 07 December 2012

      x
      It's not an argument - I'm just wondering how what I said, which was just repeating what Reggie had said, it detrimental...As my point was nothing other then just repeating what he had said, I can't see how that's a problem...Surely not accepting what he said is the issue here?

      on 08 December 2012

      x
      If you can give me specific pointers that'd be useful...

      on 09 December 2012

    • x
      < Mazty and spurgeonryan are now friends.
    • x
      < Mazty posted something on yo_john117's wall

      Why should I be permabanned in your opinion?

      x
      Because you're an alt account that's only here to make trouble.

      on 25 April 2012

      x
      This is my main account & only account. How exactly am I making trouble?

      on 25 April 2012

    < 1 - 16 of 16 <

    Game Stats

    • 100 total number of games
    • 0 games in common
    • average game rating
    • PC favourite console (43 games)
    • Shooter favourite genre (27 games)
    • 0% of games completed