| Lonely_Dolphin said: Yes, Pokemon and AC are not the same game... and? They still use saves files, with both only allowing 1 save file for the longest. Pokemon did drop single files even if it's only because of the Switch's inherent user system. You can have 8 users per Switch, therefore you can 8 save files on a single game compared to the 1 in all prior Pokemon generations which required you to buy more copies of the game for more saves. I know what shared island means and how that's different from your completely made up and nonsensical idea of a segregated island. We've already seen what the maps look like and they're very much not divided into 8 sections, you can place your house anywhere, and simultaneous multiplayer is a thing. This all means every player can affect every part of the island, obviously as it'd defeat the purpose otherwise. Even if this was true, it's still a terrible design choice that's inferior to the better way I already mentioned. lol how am I going on an outrage trip? Not all criticism towards Nintendo is unjustified hatred you know. |
Spare me your usual campaigning BS you replied to me with some outrage over something that after release will be seen as a non issue you're the definition of the type of people Jim Sterling was on about in his recent video on boycotts, different games don't require identical approaches due to different aims Pokemon is an RPG adventure AC is social sim.
Shared means you're all on the same Island that meaning that does not exclude the possibility of people having their own section nothing you've said here really disproves this possibility we've seen the map but we haven't seen how multiple users on the same console works multiplayer could be the same as ACCF for all we know where people come around to visit your space so this remains to be seen.
You're banging on in the usual manner you do everything Paper Mario, Fire Emblem, Pokemon etc... I don't care for it call your agony aunt instead.
