Hiku said:
Yeah, I left out a lot of details to save some time, in case it was already known to the reader, and to not make it too long. It was "finally" approved, after passionate fan request. It looks like something happened at Capcom around that time, where they went from being very frugal with their budget, to greenlighting multiple large scale games and taking risks again. But whoever made some of these 'risky' decisions at that time (and that includes moving Monster Hunter from portable to home console) are probably looking pretty good right now in the eyes of Capcom's higher ups. |
Yep whoever took the lead to approve MHW, RE7 and RE2R made some good decision and will be well seem by higher ups.
I'm sure I liked the REs decision and although I don't play MH people have really show support for it.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."