PAOerfulone said:
Alright, let's account for if Famitsu got it wrong and do the 120,000 and 125,000 unit numbers. At those units, divided by 0.3% would equate to: 40 million units (120,000) So those would still be way below the mark and considerably lower than VGChartz' current worldwide estimates. And if we reduce the percentage to 0.25%, they would equate to: 48 million units (120,000) Now they would be way above the mark. There's way too much deviation and margins for error are far too great to be taken seriously, that's the point. In any statistics class you take in college, the point is to maintain the smallest margin of error as possible. Enough to where you can narrow it down to a specific, small range. This range is all over the place. From as low as 36 million to as high as 50 million. You'd have better luck throwing a dart and trying to hit a bulls-eye with a blindfold on. Bottom line: There is absolutely no reason whatsoever why we should take CNBC seriously over other trackers and sources that have proven, time and time again, to be much more reliable and accurate. That's all there is to it, and if you can't understand that, then I see no point or purpose to continue this conversation. We're done here. |
And I guess the point here also is that there is no reason whatsoever why we should take Famitsu and other trackers over CNBC since all of these provide estimate based reporting. So would you mind explaining how these other trackers are more reliable and accurate. Any proof would be welcomed. I think that is going to be difficult since MS themselves do not report on their console sales numbers.
Xbox 360 and Xbox One
Gamertag: GamertagOz70