smroadkill15 said:
You're using example from previous gens, and early this gen. I guess it's impossible for someone to change how they feel about something. Even if he is just doing it for PR, probably a bit of both, it's still a change in a positive direction. He wasn't referring to full timed exclusive games in the comment, but whatever. You're right, we will see. |
That is because they wouldn't change because they became charitable, it is mostly PR and marketing. You can see plenty of his PR announcements that a new few days later were in the opposite direction.
You can see how obvious it is, because if they were changing because they though it was a bad thing they would keep it internal. But he have done all of it in an attempt to attack Sony, so all hints at he spinning the truth of he not having budget approval for the practice into all of a sudden he hating it since ever but just now being able to stop it.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."