Dragon Quest XI S reviews: Meta 90, OC 91

[Shaunodon]

Pinkie_pie said:

Shaunodon said:

Why should I have to explain it to you? Did you actually read all the reviews for all the games you've mentioned to see what their feelings were? I simply showed that this isn't the first time a newer version of a game has scored higher, and so there's precedence.

FFXV- "Although I appreciate what the Royal Pack has brought to the lore of Insomnia, its paltry additions may only appeal to the most hardcore fans who don’t mind replaying the definitive edition of a single chapter."

As for basically every other game you mention (you felt Fairy Fencer was worth mentioning?), they were all released well after the original versions, and thus would be expected to have vast improvements.


For the record, and most ironically, Persona 4 Golden also scored a few points higher on metacritic than it's original. Did you even bother to check either Persona 3 or 4 before making your rather ill-looking "guarantee" about Persona 5 Royal?

Ff15 royal has more content and only appeal to the most hardcore fans? Isnt that exactly the same with dragon quest 11 s? The last of us on ps4 released a year after the original. It has more content, looks better and runs at 60 fps but it didnt score higher than ps3 version. Gta 5 ps4 2 years after the original, dq 11 on ps4 already has enough content as it is, adding a few more after 2 years shouldnt make it have a higher score 

A good example of you still not bothering to actually read any of the reviews you're here to criticise.

Not sure why you think GTA V is somehow relevant when it already had a 97 metacritic to begin with. Scoring any higher than that is practically impossible on aggregate sites, otherwise it probably would have.

You just seem to be grasping at straws over a meaningless non-issue. More people having access to a great game is a positive thing, and having a substantially improved version of a great game is even better.