EricHiggin said:
So the corrupted hacks are going to bring justice to another corrupted hack? That's like saying I can't wait for that known murderer to kill that other known murderer. Went back? Flip flopped? So he did collude with the Russians? Seems to me the only thing they are trying to go after him for is obstruction. Obstructing the case about collusion that never happened which he knew. That's like attempting to send person A to jail for trying to stop person B from beating up person A, for something they thought person A did, but didn't do. Person A should've just took the ass kicking? |
No. That's absolutely not what it's like. I suggest you learn more about the topic before you make an absolute statement about it. 45 is a corrupted hack and yet here you are throwing out facts in order to defend him and don't care that he's corrupted but somehow you care when it's a democrat?? Seems inconsistent and biased. And if Nancy Pelosi had it her way I'm sure she wouldn't impeach but she's getting pressure from others, like AOC, to do so.
You can think whatever you like but don't be surprised when you get challenged for saying something so blatantly false.
Last edited by tsogud - on 11 September 2019