| LudicrousSpeed said: Of course they would. Naughty Dog more so than most other developers, too. Again, good to know you can read minds. You should really put that to better use. I never said anything about the size of the game. He said if it makes sense from a network effect. Similar to what you're now seeing with Sony publishing games on PC. They're not releasing Last of Us 2 on PC, that game doesn't need it. But multiplayer games that can benefit from a wider userbase, as Shawn Layden confirmed recently. He also said Outer Worlds 2 would be the type of game they'd keep exclusive. I mean, it's all there in black and white. Strange how it's only particular users that seem to have trouble following him....
Oh good, it was that interview someone else was referencing here the other day. I was thinking I'd missed some interview where Phil actually downplayed 60 frames per second. I guess this interview is popular ammo now for console warz after he talked about the next console. That whole exchange was about Sony and Microsoft marketing the mid gen refresh consoles around resolution and not frame rate. When you actually apply the context to the discussion, it makes sense. Yeah, typical gamers don't understand frames per second. Hell, most people don't even understand refresh rates on televisions. But they do understand 4k and Ultra High Def. That's why Microsoft and Sony went that route. Again, simple stuff here. Not even going to bother replying to that nonsense at the end. 0 of 1
You made predictions during the 360 era. And I will have a good laugh at your poor attempts to misrepresent what I have said. You are always comedy gold. But, as I said before, you keep that good fight alive. |
