Burning Typhoon said:
I really doubt most games run at 1080p. Most are not 1080p at 60fps. That's specifically is the issue. Sure, some games run 1080p, some games, run at lower resolutions, but locked at 60. But they're not doing both. Most games aren't doing both. So the hardware is weak. We've known this. When I got my PS4, it was packed in with a game I'd played plenty of, on PS3. The PS4 was also lacking features the PS3 had. That is why it's on my list. As for the Switch, it doesn't matter. I can be biased towards the switch. This isn't the Switch vs. PS4 vs. Xbox One. This is Switch Vs. Wii U Vs Wii, and the rest of the Nintendo consoles, which none of which I've owned, because I never saw a reason to buy or spend time on any of them. The only one that got a look from me was the Wii U... until I saw someone playing it. It was warioware. Yeah, no.... But, this is PS4 vs. PS3, and Xbox One Vs. 360 Vs. Xbox (one) :P. I like the switch for the hardware. It's the best Nintendo console ever. So of course it's not going to be on a list of the least like consoles of the big 3. It doesn't fit. It is literally 100% better than the Wii U, which also came out in this same generation. No other company has recovered so much from a failure like that. Though the only one to have failed so hard to begin with was SEGA anyway. The PS4 is a PS3.5. There's nothing that it's doing that's new to the table. Over the PS2, the PS3 gave us HDMI, multi-media functionality, blue tooth technology, seven-player support (shame it wasn't really taken advantage of). PS4 just gave slightly better graphics, and reduced functionality, and forced people to pay for online services to play... For no reason other than to line up Sony's pockets more. About the PS3. Tekken 6 runs sub 720p. And that's a valid point but the PS3 also plays PS1 and PS2 games. Some of the good games that are in the PS4's library originated on PS3. But, it also gets to be one of those things. PS3 released in 2006. It's 2013, and we still can't reach our target standard resolution for games? The jump from 1080p to 3840p is greater than 720 to 1080. So, for simplicity's sake, if the PS5 can't hit 1440p for every game at 60 FPS, that would be worse than the PS4's not hitting 1080p, and so much worse than the PS3 being sub 720 in a few games. Yes. But, we all know the PS5 will have ryzen in it, so it's saved. And you're right having features doesn't have nothing to do with how strong the hardware it. But it does have something to do with how strong the hardware is. Doesn't the PS4 feature a better GPU over the Xbox One? Not that it matters today. You can get an Xbox One X, or even better, a PC, if you really want something nice. |
Well I debunked the whole PS4 runs games sub 1080p. Again, most games run at 1080p. Which is factual. No matter how tech heavy the game is. Please don't add the framerate bit because I never mentioned anything about framerate. You're kind of arguing yourself in circles here. I told you I'm not focused on anything about what the PS4 offers. That's totally your prerogative. I'm not into debating what you prefer. Different strokes for different folks. That's why when people here argue themselves to the ground with what one consoles does better than the other and why they prefer it, I just watch.
Anyway, while you've answered why you believed the PS4 is weak....you didn't answer why you think it's weak compared to the others you've listed. Then again, I guess you saying you're comparing it to the previous PS consoles and not the competition. So I guess you did answer it. That's pretty much all you had to say. You didn't have to go on about the other stuff. I told you how I felt about the Switch. I love it too. Which is why it's not on my list.
Just FYI, both Microsoft and Nintendo also have paid services. Not just Sony. You like what you like though. I respect your opinion at the end of the day. Thanks for keeping it civil.
PSN ID- RayCrocheron82
XBL Gamertag- RAFIE82
NNID- RAFIE82/ Friend Code: SW-6006-2580-8237
YouTube- Rafie Crocheron