sundin13 said:
This is probably the silliest argument of all time... Just, ugh...why? Its so trivial... |
Not trivial at all. I need Trump to name names in order to know who he's talking about.
Machiavellian said:
This came from your comment. You said it was cool for them to leave and go somewhere else to fix someone else problem which would mean they have to abandon their own position to accomplish your happy in the pie cool suggestion. Also since you quotes the word "Progressive" I am guessing you did that on purpose to distinguish just that group and no one else. Sure you would want them back, since you did not determine a time, it could be indefinitely. As long as you state you want them back without any time frame you can also just leave it open and indefinite. |
"happy in the pie"
>heh
"Sure you would want them back, since you did not determine a time, it could be indefinitely. As long as you state you want them back without any time frame you can also just leave it open and indefinite."
>No return time was stated. Doesn't mean there can't be one.
the-pi-guy said:
The media called these 4 "the squad" https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/15/politics/who-are-the-squad/index.html and a day later, Trump has "the squad" in his tweets https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1151451067437191168?s=19 The same set of tweets calls the same group of people "the four congresswomen". The set of tweets even calls them "the four horsemen of the apocalypse". So back to this discussion: "Do you honestly think that Trump wants them to come back and lead the country?" >Yes! Read Trump's tweet Do you honestly think that Trump wants someone who he seems to think are "the four horsemen of the apocalypse" running the country? No matter how you try spinning it, it is clear to anyone who is being honest that Trump was being disingenuous about wanting them to come back. |
Or maybe Trump wants them back once they're no longer "horsewomen of the apocalypse"? Just about anything is possible when it comes to open speculation.
