d21lewis said:
linkink said:
Pretty the much same thing with PS4. Once the order 1886, second son, horizon, and god of war came, pretty much The majority was in agreement that the leap was huge, and sufficient. With the PS2 this was not the case at all, it was being compared to dreamcast, Not ps1/n64 just to show how big the gap was. People online were saying it wasn't a big enough leap over dreamcast. That all ended with the MGS2 trailer which blew every dreamcast game away graphically at the time, kinda the same with order 1886, Everyone jaw dropped saying it was CGI level.
You can't have a serious conversation about graphics when you say higher resolution makes things worse, its's honestly the first time i have heard a opinion like that. You seem not to be into realistic graphics, which most games that push the envelope are aiming for realistic graphics so i guess it makes sense. It is impressive being able to that in zelda, but we have seen that before on 360/ps3, and most games are doing that now.
|
I'm on my phone so trimming down the post is not worth the effort. I just wanted to say that the PS2 and Dreamcast are from the same generation. People may have said "The PS2 isn't a big enough leap over the Dreamcast" at launch but the Dreamcast launched with Soul Calibur--a HUGE leap over Sega Saturn, PS1, and N64 graphics.
|
Yes i'm aware dreamcast is the same generation. just pointing out the leap was so massive from ps1 to ps2, that nobody ever compared ps1/64 it was being compared to a console from the same generation.
