outlawauron said:
None of things separate it from its competitors. PS1 and PS2 had far more distruptive change than either of those platforms. |
Actually none of those platforms were disruptive. PS1, PS2, N64, Gamecube...none were disruptive.
Disruptive means that functionality suffers so that you can improve some other aspect: reliability, convenience or price. For example Google Stadia is potentially disruptive because the games all look like they perform worse, but you don't have to buy a console. So functionality suffers but people save money compared to what came before.
PS1, PS2, N64, and Gamecube were not disruptive, because they improved the specs compared to the previous generation and the prices all went up. It's just that with Playstation the hardware was more expensive but with the N64 the cartridges were more expensive. As a whole, both systems were more expensive compared to the SNES, the leader of the previous generation. That is the opposite of disruptive.
curl-6 bet me that PS5 + X|S sales would reach 56m before year end 2023 and he was right.
My Bet With curl-6
My Threads:
Master Thread, Game of the Year/Decade
Switch Will Be #1 All Time
Zelda Will Outsell Mario (Achieved)
How Much Will MH Rise sell?
My Bet With Metallox