The evidence is in relation to the impact of game content on children, not the low crime rate.
I have already said that I don't have any 'serious research' into the subject. I can't be more open about this.
You are making sweeping statements as if they are objectively true. They aren't.
My position is that this game content has some impact on child harm, even if minimally, something your own word choice adheres to.
You know that the one who makes the claim have to proof, you already said you don't have any proof that these types of games harm any child, so you can't demand that anyone presents proof on the opposite.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"