Quantcast
View Post
ArchangelMadzz said:
DonFerrari said:

Makes no difference, pixels don't hurt people.

Video game characters don't hurt people. All I said was defending the idea of depicting kids in sex games is weird, even though they're just video games. 

I'm just saying it's easy to see WHY Sony do not want games like that on their platform. They're not trying to get them removed from existence, they just don't want it on their systems and they're perfectly in their right to do so, same with the epic games store. Steam is a place these people can go to. 

For me it is more than weird, but their removal doesn't really benefit anyone.

And the problem on this for me is that Sony is doing it out of external pressure and fear of #metoo movement and gamergate. They are basically bending over and taking something that is acceptable in Japan to please non-gamer on the west.

These games sell very little.

Also it worries some people that this could lead to more censorship, like some games that Sony was already not allowing release overseas, some censor in ports like happened to Yakuza series.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994