DonFerrari said:
I have no idea why people get so offended by pixels to the point to forfeit freedom over it.
Yep, I really don't like the idea of a government deciding for everyone even on almost universal concepts, so taste/opinion is a point where that is totally unacceptable.
I'm very against law in general. Law should be minimal and simple, covering basic human rights, everything else is to be agreed between people. Companies censoring is also bad (but less than government), best "censorship" that exist is market. Company releases content/product and people who don't like don't buy.
I remember the time on PS1 there were official releases of porn for the console. Or in PSVita that we have UMD porn.
Everyone should have a problem with all form of censorship.
Sony had this type of content and they are pressured to change, so the censorship would be coming from your field.
He is not comparing it to Sony. He is saying that having government censorship instead of company is bad, and that nazi/korea censorship is government level where everyone on those countries have no option instead of company policy that you can choose not to buy.
I have a daughter, thanks for your judgmental ignorance.
The country have low crime, including pedophilia. They do have a lot of fetiche for woman that look like teen, but they harm no child in doing that.
In Japan is even common to have some hookers that are into their 30s dressing like elementary school and having their face looking very young, that is a fetiche they have. Still that don't harm any child. Pixel porn of girl that also look under 18 don't harm kids. And you can even trace who buy this type of material and see if they also go to other habits as buying real child porn or exploring teenagers sexually.
|
