By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SpokenTruth said:
DarthMetalliCube said:

A reaction to what exactly? Speech? New ideas? There is absolutely no justification to "react" to speech in the way they do, just because you don't agree with it. Ideas are largely subjective in terms of their positive or negative impact on people/society. Violence is not. 

Maybe they aren't "Fascist" in the traditional sense or on a government level - but they certainly use Fascist-like tactics because as they're using force to basically shape discourse and thus society for the benefit of "the collective". Sure the collective might not be for the "state" in this case, but it's still a top-down sort of operation.

At the very least, they should be considered terrorists performing terrorist acts. I've also heard the term Anarcho-Fascist to describe them.

And there is such a thing as left-wing Fascism, so it does make sense.

That would make it government operated.  Don't you mean they are a bottom-up operation? 

Which again, is the opposite of fascism.

Fair enough. I'll stick with the more accurate terms "Anarcho-Fascist" and "terrorists" then.



 

"We hold these truths to be self-evident - all men and women created by the, go-you know.. you know the thing!" - Joe Biden