pikashoe said:
Price matters because you are comparing Sony and Nintendo game sales. If you are going to say they have entered Nintendo level sales than, they either need to start selling a lot more than they are or maintain these sales at a higher price point. Also who applauds Nintendo for not reducing prices, it's a very common complaint. I didn't mean that 10 million didn't count I meant that 17 million didn't count. I probably should have worded that better. The goty point is just silly, that's just an incredibly tiny fraction that do that. I never claimed everyone I know double dipped I said most people I know that had it on ps3 got it again on ps4. I wouldn't say that because I just bought the game once on ps4. To quote you "you should avoid calling others liars". The Brazil point makes sense. Although I did mention that it is more common in the US and Europe Sony's 2 largest markets. Ok, i never said games that became multiplat didn't sell better on ps3. I never said those developers werent around and i never said that Sony didn't make 1st party content in the past. I said the larger focus on 1st party content since ps3 has paid off this gen. I'm not trying to downplay Sony's 1st party sales, they just aren't at Nintendo levels yet. I've bought all of the games listed in the op. I enjoy most of Sony 1st party content and hope they continue to grow. I'll quote you again "you should avoid calling others liars" |
Yes I'll be sure to remember to put tangent points when anyone talk good of Nintendo. Nintendo is the odd man out on SW pricing. And there are companies that sell much more than Nintendo and Sony but on fewer number of titles. Also most of the sales happen on the first couple months, so not affected by pricing. From the number of posts you have you seem to participate very little on threads. There have been more defense for Nintendo pricing than complain as have been more defense for they going for lower power and simpler graphics. There is seemly a majority of Nintendo fanbase in VGC and mostly supporting more than criticizing. Even on the points that are blatantly criticizable.
You have no way to demonstrate how many double dip on GOTY or remaster so it is pointless. And he have conceeded from the beggining that TLOU probably wouldn't sell 17M without being in 2 systems. But the major point was before and regarded it not being acceptable as a 10M on PS4.
I haven't said you are a liar, just that you claiming he was lying when you made an equivalent opposite post. How much percentage of your friends make for ALMOST EVERYONE?
You mentioned after claiming he was a liar and he having to say he isn't, like twice.
Not sure why you are putting twice the avoid calling other liars as I didn't say you are a liar a single time. What are you trying to imply here?
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."