Medisti said:
Such as? Nintendo has censored its own games and games it publishes (such as Bravely Default) for a long time, but they haven't curated third-party content since like the 1990s. And there's a big difference between Nintendo saying, "Let's change our own games for different markets" even though I still disagree with that, and Sony saying, "Let's tell third-party devs what they can and can't do regardless of the local ratings boards." Seriously, This is why PEGI and ESRB and all those exist. There's no need for Sony to police it further because there are systems in place already to police it. |
Well... I guess... but they also haven’t really had any mature games on their systems that they would have to worry about that with... there really isn’t a market for those type of games on Nintendo systems... but I’m pretty sure Nintendo would have issues with third party games with mature content like that. It’s basically part of their culture and is a counter to the audience they are trying to cultivate. I guess I can’t really say for sure since Nintendo doesn’t really deal with third parties that much anymore... basically, I would think Nintendo would try to censor more based on their history, audience, and business culture.
