By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari said:
deskpro2k3 said:
Similar words but the scores is all over the place. This is bullshit.

"Marvel’s Spider-Man is the best game you will play this year" - 100
DarkStation

"This feels like the most authentic Spider-Man game" - 90
The Daily Dot

"best Spider-Man game to date" - 80
We Got This Covered

"The best Spider-Man game ever made" - 70
Metro GameCentral

"This game shows tremendous love for all things Spider-Man" - 60
Guardian

Seems ridiculous that they can think the best game ever made deserves a 70 unless they think everything else is trash.. and that all the love for spider deserves a 60 do they hate it?

When someone reviews a game at the Guardian they have to give it either 1 Star, 2 Stars, 3 Stars, 4 Stars, or 5 Stars. If you told that paper's editor that there was such a thing as a score of 3.5 Stars, or 4.5 Stars his head would explode. 

PwerlvlAmy said: 
I think people just need to accept that not all game reviewers think the game is the best ever and that some of them are going to disagree and give it a lower score. Not everything can be 9's and 10's and just because it doesn't match the score you personally give it,does not negate that reviewers score that put it lower. 87 is a great score and shouldn't be frowned upon at all. Everyone go out and buy the game, regardless of any reviews

I can live with a 70 or 80. That's fine. Hell, I can live with a 60, a 50, or a 01. So long as said reviewer isn't a whopping 25 points away from the general consensus of the game. 

Last edited by Cerebralbore101 - on 04 September 2018