Cerebralbore101 said:
1. If the other two systems don't exist yet, it was never meant to be exclusive. There just wasn't anything else to release it on at the time. And it would have been faster to release the sequel on those systems than bother doing a port of the first game. 2. Of course it must be released on PS2 first. Otherwise we're not talking about Sony exclusives going multiplatform. And the argument was that Sony exclusives have been going multiplatform since before PS3. 3. Prove to me that Burnout wasn't always intended as multiplat. They probably started working on ports of Burnout before the PS2 copies even shipped. 5. Yeah, I gave you DMC3 releasing on PC. 6. Yes of course it has to be released during PS2's generation. This argument is about games going multiplatform before PS3. Post 2006 isn't before PS3, and therefore doesn't help your case. |
Ok. I’ll get you that list. As for Burnout, the onus is on you to prove that the games were just delayed. From where we’re sitting now, it started as a PS2 exclusive.
Also, don’t use AC Pocket Camp as an example as the examples that I gave were released on dedicated systems. Would we say that Persona would be discounted because it’s a spin-off? Valkyria Revolution is not a VC game? Also, technically AC isn’t exclusive to Nintendo systems if they’re also releasing it on mobile. That doesn’t change no matter what 99% of this site says.