| Ka-pi96 said: Those two things aren't even close to being the same though... |
Exactly. Extremely low reasoning skills by the OP!!
Net neutrality was about protecting the internet. There is no reason to be against net neutrality unless you are extremely dumb or you're an elected official entirely devoid of ethics and you are getting paid to permanently damage the internet (Republicans).
That has nothing to do with individual companies deciding they will no longer allow a guy goes around spewing hatred, conspiracy theories, and lies to spread that crap on their platforms. They have every right to kick him off and thank god they have. They aren't kicking him off for the color of his skin, his sexual orientation, his country of origin, or anything like that. They are kicking him off for the disgusting and vile nature of his content. They have every right to do that and they are doing a service to their communities by doing this.
Funny that Republicans think companies should be able to not do business with whoever they want and cry out in glee when some bigoted conservative business refuses someone for something like sexual orientation and then when one of your own gets refused for spreading lies and hate speech and in general being a disgusting a-hole suddenly you adopt the exact opposite position and think no one should ever be allowed to not do business with anyone and you lamely try to play the victim and make false equivalences (a republican specialty).
