By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RuiOrey said:
DonFerrari said:

Concept is the same on your provocative question.

He paid for one experience, it was changed, he doesn't like. It seems like you wouldn't as well.

No man it is not the same. 
The game is not the sex of the person. You are comparing a game with a date or paid sexual encounter. Is not the same. 
The game is not something that you buy usually because of the sex of the main character.
The value of the product goes beyond that.

And we are not talking about a game was bought and the main character was changed after it being bought.
You are talking about changing sex at the middle of the encounter.

I can also give an example of an all boys club that now has some girl. And now boys dont like.
So then we can also tell that you are saying that the game was an all boys club.
You can get absurd comparisons.

About the hooker, that is a too private question, but one day I can tell you in private.

And there are games, movies, books where you change the main character at the middle. And sometimes it has different sex.
You are changing the experience?

So maybe people that did not liked before the game now like because of that. So that guy does not like, imagine how people that played the game and now identify with the character variation feel.
So not possible to always please everyone.

I dont give a crap. For a game if changes the character at the middle I dont care.
If you are talking about sexual intercourse or a relationship that is different for me. 
But ok for you is the same. 

And if the change in between of the game is for another man ..is that better for you or for that guy?
That keeps the experience?

Define me how the experience change affects you or that guy.

1st part yes, it isn't about making sex. It's about buying something and the expectations that go with it, them having it changed and not liking. Not everyone that doesn't like is a bad person as people attacking OP seems to think.

2nd changing sex during encounter, versus changing sex in the middle of the franchise (some games the char being something and then the same char being changed) so it's equivalent.

3rd if a club is all man clubs then no female should be there as much as an all female shouldn't have men.

4th I wouldn't have a problem with a female or male char in a game or book being a trans that you discover during the game as long as it is meaningful for the game. There is a series where that is an possibility on the rumors.

5th I don't need the gender, color or religion of the char to be able to relate. We play even aliens, robots and animals no problem. So the excuse that they need to change char to make people happier (even when those aren't even their core markets) is silly).

6th for me changing one side or the other is the same.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."