By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ArnoldRimmer on 28 March 2018
Edit Thread
SpokenTruth said:
ArnoldRimmer said:

Perfect proof of what I just said: You're admitting that you haven't seen any actual proof whatsoever, you're just confident that the fact that some countries are taking action must mean that there must be truth to the accusations. You're probably not even wondering why it's basically only US allied countries on that list, maybe haven't even heard that it's very typical for the US to apply pressure to allied countries to join in on such actions, and I assume you're not even wondering why most countries on that list are only expelling the bare minimum, 1 or 2 diplomats, which indicates that they were reluctant to do so.

If you're going to debase others for making assumptions, make damn certain you don't make them yourself.

Sorry, I'm not getting what you're referring to.

What I'm trying to say is that I find that "Well, I admit I haven't seen any proof whatsoever, but if so many countries join in and also expell diplomats, I guess there must be something to the accusations"-thinking a bit weird.

But anyway: Please, name me just one plausible explanation why russia, out of all the billions of reliable ways they could have killed the guy, they instead decided to try to kill him in the one way that instantly points towards them, and which is obviously extremely unreliable (since none of the victims died so far). I so far still haven't heard any plausible explanation for this; instead, in my eyes this very fact rather screams "false flag attack - the true target of the operation wasn't even to kill the guy, but to immediately suggest that russia was responsible".

There's also the question why russia didn't simply kill the guy years ago, when he was in imprisoned in russia for his actions. But the former question is much more pressing.

Last edited by ArnoldRimmer - on 28 March 2018