By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
potato_hamster said:
Pemalite said:

Except it doesn't. Try again.

You are trying to conflate two different issues which is a logical fallacy. Try again.

I'll play your game one last time. All you're saying is"baseless drivel".

You can't have it both ways. You can't refuse to articulate why you feel your sources support your claims and simply assert they answer the issues I have with it and then expect me to go through and display the intellectual rigor that you just opted out of. It doesn't work your way.
 
 I'm done with your nonsense.

K. Thanks. Bye.

Since you have done it first, by ignoring the sources and citations on his post you can't demand that he go and look at the details of the others... seems like you have it reversed.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."