By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Superman4 said:
o_O.Q said:

"Yes the US is involved in a lot of things I dont feel we should be but we dont start conflicts."

 

if the us doesn't start conflicts ( bullshit ) how do you get involved in things you shouldn't be involved in?

 

what happened with iraq? or lybia? or syria? how was the united states attacked first in any of those wars?

We didnt start the Iraq war, we didnt start the Afghanistan war etc. Lybia, Syria, Iraq etc. were all fighting their own battles and murdering people by the thousands. We picked a side. When we were attacked twice at the World Trade Center site we decided to fight back. I dont feel that we need to be involved in a lot of what we are, I dont think that we need to have bases all around the world or supply countries with weapons. We are also not the only ones doing so. N Korea poses a threat to everyone, not just the US. It has already commited an act of war by firing two missles at Japan, how do we know they meant to miss? 

So how did the united states get involved in the wars in iraq, lybia and syria? are you saying those countries were responsible for the world trade attacks?

 

". N Korea poses a threat to everyone, not just the US. It has already commited an act of war by firing two missles at Japan, how do we know they meant to miss? "

 

the united states for the past few decades fired and hit targets in the countries i mentioned above among others... following your logic the united states is a far bigger threat to  any country in the world than north korea right?

 

oh and another thing, the united states is currently involved in a war in syria right? 

 

so if north korea comes along and attacks the u s then that's ok according to your logic right?