By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TheDarkBender said:

numberwang said:
"Anonymous sources told us" - story is already being retracted as fake ...

- tweet -

Of course she would say it's not true, even if it were true. And even so, maybe you should actually look into what you're posting.

Veselnitskaya said she did not know why Trump Jr. believed she was planning to offer damaging information about Clinton.

 

"It is quite possible that maybe they were longing for such information," she told NBC. "They wanted it so badly that they could only hear the thought that they wanted."

She said Trump Jr. asked her just one question: whether she had financial records indicating inappropriate donations to the Democratic National Committee.

(http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-lawyer-idUSKBN19W174)

In other words, the intentions of Trump Jr. were to find dirt on Hillary Clinton from the Russians in order to damage her campaign, which is illegal.

The intent was to find dirt on Hillary. The fact it was from a Russian lawer doesnt mean anything. WHat I find facinating is the fact that nobody on the left actually wants the truth, they just want to hang Trump because he won. Even if the Russians had a crap ton of dirt on the Clintons and released it all, the left would be all over it for all the wrong reasons. How about looking at the information and validating it? If the Russian goverment hacked the DNC email and released a bunch of emails the Dems sent people and exposed them for the crap talking money hungry people they are, that should be the story, not the fact that they were hacked. The hacking while an issue by itself still exposed the information that people seem to ignore.  If the Russians have evidence of the Clintons using the Clinton foundation for personal gain, lets see it. Its time to stop the BS and politics and start to move on. Focus on making our country stronger, not pissing off half the nation for a whtch hunt wih no merrit and wasting billions in the process.