By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
barneystinson69 said:
Zkuq said:

There's no proof because he just fired the guy leading the investigation in whether he collaborated with the Russians. How can it be that hard to see? Now I'm not saying there could have been, or will be, any proof, or that he did collaborate with Russia, but if he did, this sure is a good move to hide it. He's brought this on himself, collaboration with Russia or not.

His days were numbered either way, especially with how he handled the email thing. And investigations have already been put into Russian collaboration since the election - nothing has shown a direct connection with Trump so far. Its been 7 months, yet nothing has come up. Its a story that the leftist media has been dragging on because they want to find something to destroy his presidency, but the simple fact is that the Russian's did not "rig" the election...

7 months is not a long time for this type of investigation.  They would not acknowledge that the sitting president is under investigation for collaborating with Russia until they had dotted every "i" and crossed every "t".  Basically, we won't hear anything until the investigation is over.  Which is why this is such a big deal if Trump is able to appoint someone that will then be able to control the investigation.