By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mafioso said:
Pemalite said:

Except nVidia or more specifically, Pascal... Tends to have more performance than AMD even with "less GPU resources and compute ability".

Until the next round of GPU's come out and driver support hits that proverbial brick wall that shows AMD GPU's aging better and better performing at DX12 and Vulkan....time and time again... 

Devs don't have to wait on drivers for console, games come right off the metal and DX12 is baked in this case. Underwritting this custom design is silly, AMD cores were built to be used this way to their fullest, no driver overhead like on PC reducing performance. In this case its running above the base clock of the PC part (one that features less CU's) , has a wide bus, hardware optimizations(not just software) ...this thing is going to be a graphics  workhorse in a small box you can fit on your stand shelf. Pretty rad.

Consoles have drivers as well. They also get updated.

Consoles also share the same API's as PC and then some.

Consoles have bloated monolithic OS's.

AMD GPU's do tend to excel in a few scenario's because of Asynchronous Compute, but nVidia is owning AMD right now. That can't be disputed, nVidia has such a massive efficiency lead over AMD.



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--