Darwinianevolution said:
LivingMetal said:
Ok, I see where you're coming from. And what I'm about to say doesn't excuse what's being done. As we know, most new games retail for $60 new. I can see where both single player and multi player contents are on the disk, but someone such as myself can only access the single player content because I have no interest in multi player. But the publisher/developer probably would have charged $60 anyway if only single player content alone was on the disc. In this case (but I suspect there are other cases), I honestly don't see it being an issue.
|
That's true, but it still doesn't make it right. If anything, it makes it less fair, because they are not adapting their prices to the demand of the consumers.
|
Don't expect this to happen anytime soon because this was and always has been the case for the longest time. Two vastly different games can cost a retail price of $60 yet one could have cost the developer 1/2 the budget to make. It is what it is.