EvenLuck said:
danasider said:
EvenLuck said:
McDonaldsGuy said:
EvenLuck said:
|
danasider said:
Games like Super Mario 3d World or 8 player Smash (yes, 4 player Smash is online) could have definitely done better with an online experience considering they are multiplayer games.
|
Smash, I can agree with, because that's the core of the franchise. However, do tell me how Super Mario 3D World would be better with an online experience?
|
It's a multiplayer game
|
Ok, let me rephrase: why would Super Mario 3D World be better with an online experience?
|
Don't know if you missed my response a few posts above, so I'll reply again.
Instead of having 4 people required to be next to each other, 4 people could play (online) co-op at the comfort of their own homes with strangers or friends. It's not something that would make or break the game, just the fact that a AAA first party top tier game like Super Mario 3d World doesn't offer it is disappointing.
|
Alright, HOW is that disappointing?
|
First of all, to clarify one thing (don't know if you even read it this way), I don't mean the game, itself, is disappointing. It has critical acclaim and Nintendo pedigry so I am not trashing the game.
The lack of an online experience is disappointing, because it seems like a logical feature for a game like this. Four people can play on 1 screen, but for some reason Nintendo didn't add the option for a person to enjoy that co-op feature online.
Say a person doesn't have people to play with around him/her, said person could go online and play some Mario co-op with either some strangers or friends that aren't local. Without the option, I am sure a good deal of people are missing out on the multiplayer aspect of this game.
