Soriku said:
Griffin said:
Soriku said:
This is the most retarded article I've ever seen. |
Coming from a 13yearold i could see how you would have problems with articles that would limit the amount of games you play. Did you read the article, everything they listed were solid facts, and i for one would consider twice about any of these games if i had small children. |
Yeah...I can play any game I want if you didn't already know that, thanks. Except the simple thing is...it's really retarded.
I mean, what's this?
"I'm sorry, what? A 10 year-old boy is traveling the countryside with an old professor he has no relation to? By all the ESRB's guidelines this is an E-Rated game with no objectionable content. Players step into the role of Luke, a young boy who solves riddles and puzzles and gets praised by his older professor friend. Though the content is not explicitly M, the thought of a young boy traveling the countryside with an old man is as creepy as an alter boy sharing room in a confessional booth with a priest.
Talking about Professor Layton. And there are also other stupid things.
I hope this is a joke. |
Congrats you can play whatever you want, but can you buy whatever games you want. Stores have stated before that they will not sell games to underage kids if they are buying M rated games. If they are selling games to minors then maybe someone should phone the stores and have a word with them.
I also don't see anything wrong with what they said about that game.
@LordTheNightKnight, why would i list what the article is saying in this thread?
