No, I don't think it's right, but because I don't agree with how games are reviewed.
I mean, I understand that when magazines were the only way for us to know about the games and its quality, developers and reviewers would work with unfinished products with the promise of "it will be fixed by launch". It was the only way to have the games reviewed in time for its launch.
The problem is that this practice still exists today with web sites that don't have theproblems of the old magazines. There is no excuse to review a game based on an unfinished product when developers could provide a fully finished code of the game, with the so often news of "the game has gone gold" to make the reviews.
Of course, usually most of the problems are fixed by the time the games are launched, but when it doesn't happen, we have sh!t like this.
Please excuse my bad English.
Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.
