By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:

Goatseye said:

Mattrick worked for Xbox, just because they made him a scapegoat, doesn't change the fact that he was working for them. Mattrick(E3) was a part of Xbox. Why can't Microsoft Control their PR while Sony can? Where is all that extra money going? Maybe if MS was going bankrupt we could see them actually try and care. 

The irony is you confused the X2ndbox, which was a pun on the XB1's name on how the Xbox 1's successor would be called, and you confused it with the Xbox 360 thus mentioning XBLA.

I wonder how long it will take before, Xbox Fans become the equivalent of Nintendo Fans today.

It hilarious how the company best suited to improve gaming, gets the most excuses. The OG Xbox made its successors look miles behind in innovation.

Mattrick was a part of Xbox but under his leadership Xbox never seemed fresh like it is under Phil Spencer.

In MS, members are free to speak. MS doesn't need to invest in X1 as the Xbox division been profitable for a while now.It invests from what it earns.

I didn't confuse X2 with anything, your common assumption as a group is that X360 had a lack of games from 2011 till now and it would be the same on future boxes. And then I shot down your analogy with XBLA.

Nintendo fans know what they want and they are a great community. They don't constantly act entitled by creating multiple petitions, they don't look at others' consoles to compare them down to a chip  of paint, they are satisfied when Nintendo provide enough 1st party content and don't have to look at what neighbors have. If that's Nintendo fans you're talking about, I see no problem on X community becoming like that.

X consoles are more than graphic cards update, you'll never wrap your head around that.