| snyps said: Based on my experience with third party/sony/ms games, most of those you listed aren't going to be great. Nintendo on the other hand is a guarantee for greatness. Just because a game gets a large budget and a front cover on game informer doesn't mean it'll be a great game. An you're just looking at 1 point of my thread. Can you deny Nintendo is holding every top spot on the chartz on the front page? Is diminishing that and trying to make me feel embarrassed not embarrassing on your part? |
Yeah, the games aren't going to be great because they're not on your preferred system. That sound about right? Of course it does. When we've seen how good the gameplay to these games looks, it doesn't matter whether they're on the front cover of Game Informer or not. I also like Nintendo consoles. Good games on the consoles I own benefit me, but being a first party game means nothing to me. There are a lot of first party or third party exclusive Nintendo first party games that aren't as good as people make them out to be, same with Sony, and Microsoft. Just look at my reviews on Pokemon X/Y and Ni No Kuni for two exclusives from both sides t hat I thought were poor games.
And no. Not embarassing at all. I'm not the one who's trying to compare sales of a year old console that's about to be overtaken by two consoles that are two months old.
