By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
drkohler said:
OooSnap said:

So get me this straight. You actually believe that organisms supposedly 100+ million years old, and some that are  supposedly 400+ million years old, can remain the same physically, but humans supposedly evolved from an ape ancestor in just 7 million years? Really? If you want to believe that story.

There are many amber fossils, supposedly millions and millions of years old, and they look exactly identical like their modern counterparts. Somehow they just said no to evolution.

Again, you prove that you have no clue what evolution is. Evolution is not "Let's evolve into something different, just because it is fun". There are reasons why things evolved into other things and why other things no longer evolved into more other things. Humans did not evolve from an ape ancestor, apes and humans evolved from a common ancestor. But you alread< knew that, so there is no point in explaining it to you. You won't listen. This is something I've been wondering about the creatonists/die hard biblical lot, for like, ever: Why do these people feel so frightened about science?

Of course, evolution is anything what evolutinionists want it to be as long it keeps their fairytale going.

Answer this question. Did evolutionists expect "living fossils" and amber fossils to have evolve, Yes or no? Did supposed millions of years of stasis contradict the evolutionists' predictions, yes or no?

If you answered No, then you need to take it up with the evolutionists I quoted.