badgenome said: I'm not sure you understood the Cato thing. Medical coverage as a necessity =/= medical necessity. |
The argument CATO would make is that you can stop differentiating when something is or is not a need. I was trying to reach for one example here, and it was a bit of a stretch to find something.
And individuals will say that emergency rooms = sufficiency.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_12/027194.php
http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/001571.htm
What is a medical necessity outside of someone needing medical help? I don't see anyone say the person has a "BMW necessity". A BMW is a not a necessity.