By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
papamudd said:
I'm sorry but KZ3 was a great game. 84 metacritic with a fairly close user review averaging at 7.9. So the users of the game and critics were fairly close in its review. I have a lot of fun on the multiplayer, the game supports clan battles. Compare that too Halo 4 (halo a game with a fanatic following) got an 87 metacritic, but a distinctly lower user score of 6.9
http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/halo-4
http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/killzone-3

Furthermore, KZ3 beat out Crysis 2 for best looking FPS on console
http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-killzone-3-vs-crysis-2-analysis/

Though to be fair I think I enjoyed Crysis 2 way more than KZ3 multiplayer... Crysis 3 less so

Comparing the screen shots and reviews on Lensoftruth.com I'm not sure if Halo 4 even looks better than KZ3, but I think its fairly close. KZ3 has a bit more grittiness, and Halo 4 has some flair to the graphics that make it look beautiful, but even still I think KZ3 might have the upper hand in graphics over Halo 4 (though that might just be my preference on art style)

Lens Of truth????????

Digital Foundry say different.

Crysis 2 definately looks better than Killzone 3 technically. 

Technically Halo 4 is better than both Killzone 3 and Crysis 2. Only Crysis 3 Matches Halo 4 for FPS visuals