By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Turkish on 10 February 2013
Edit Thread
thismeintiel said:
Turkish said:


I think you're acting immature with your constant use of fuck. Neither fuck nor putting your text in bold is bringing more truth to your claim. As I've already showed you the average tv screen sizes increasing, there is really nothing to discuss anymore, you keep coming back to me without any source or proof. I asked you to provide a source backing up your ridicilous claim that European rooms are smaller than American ones, but you haven't, neither did you for your other assumption that people won't/can't fit a 60" tv in their living room.

I think the his whole argument is void when you consider anyone saying you can't tell the difference between 1080P and 4K, unless you have a X" screen is full up BS.  We had the same arguments back when people were arguing we didn't need 720P or 1080P TVs, cause you couldn't tell the difference between them and 480P unless the screen is so big.  You can ALWAYS tell the difference when there is a increase in PPI, even on a small iPhone.  Well, unless you have poor eyesight.

It's just like th chart Gilgmesh just posted.  Do you think people even follow those guidelines?  Hell no.  Later this year, or sometime next year, I plan on getting a 75" Laservue.  Now, it will most likely be only 8' away from my couch, while that chart would suggest the distance should be around 9-9.5' away from each other.  I don't care what some chart says, but I'm damn sure its going to look much better than the 52"  TV I got, now.

Indeed, you can find a lot of threads dating from 2006-2007 of people questionning the need of 1080p. My 50" tv from 2,5m is definetly not big enough for me. In a few years when I'm in the market for a new tv I'll go for +65"