By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ninjablade on 02 February 2013
Edit Thread
zero129 said:
Attoyou said:
teigaga said:
Attoyou said:
teigaga said:

C'mon man, it may not look like what you expect of next gen but it had and shoulders above Skyrim and Red Dead in terms of lighting, textures and draw distance.. It looks like a high end PC game. But yeah, I agree that I don't think that game should act as an indicator of what we'll see for ps4/720 in terms of open world RPGs. I suspect even the worst looking next gen games will be a few notches ahead of the standard we see coming from the wii U.

Oh yeah, its ahead of Skyrim and Red dead in a lot of areas, though lighting still goes to Red Dead from what i have seen (GTA5 is even better)

The game looks nice and should get some improvements before its out. But a graphical powerhouse? Nope. 

For the consoles that are currently available? Yes! lol

 

X is doing things thats just not possible on current gen consoles. the texture res alone on X would be impossible on current gen consoles. So yes X is a nextgen game as it just wouldnt be possible to be made look as good as it does on the WiiU on 360 or PS3 and thats a simple fact.

@OP With Cyperpunk and now this (Judging looks like its going to be for the Witcher 3) we are in for some great gaming and graphics.

To the people saying this wont look better then Crysis your kidding yourselfs.

code x is not even better then currentgen, show me these amazing textures that your talking about, RDR has alpha textures every where and the lighting is dynamic, unlike X which has mostly prepaked and static, please use real facts next time. as for the CDred project, the pic looks nice, nothing amazing but wait till you see it in motion, i'm sure it will blow us away.