haxxiy said:
IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
Nor did I ever say that that was the case. I just concluded that a kid with wealthy parents have greater chances of entering private schools of high quality, which I find unfair. A child with rich parents evidently has more options.
|
What the hell? Because you have the money to pay for something better, that's unfair? Look buddy, if I have ten bucks I can force the vendor to sell Halo 4 to me. I gotta be happy with Angry Birds, see? It would be unfair with the developers and unfair with those who could pay more if the case was otherwise. Suck it up and accept it as a fact of life. Even if you could have half the populace to agree with you and come up with the perfect nanny state and somehow avoid bankrupting the country, it would lead to stagnation for there wouldn't be a reason for people to stand out and no more reason for Halo 4 to be different from Angry Birds. Again, suck it up and accept it if you still think that's unfair. Life is, after all.
|
Well, congratulations. It looks like you successfully managed to miss my entire point.
Of course people with more money should have exclusive access to more expensive things in life; people who work more or have more prestigious jobs deserve extra cash. When it comes to kids though, it is completely unfair to limit their possibilities by their parents' wallets. Kids don't choose where to be born. In a perfect world everyone would have the same options and then fully deserve whatever education and, later on, job/paycheck they choose to work for.
