kain_kusanagi said:
You think it's ok to take 75% of someone's earnings? You then go on to say 50% is still reasonable. I suppose you think the state knows how to spend people's money better then they do? At 75% 1,000,000 would become 250,000 That's a big difference. If you earned that money I think you would want to spend it on what you want instead of losing 75% of it to taxes. Even 50% is far too much. I mean, wouldn't a tax system and spending system that requires 10% of everyone with no loopholes be fair and work a lot better? It's just as unfair to make the rich pay more as it is to give the lazy free money. |
In this case noone actually needs 1 million dollars or even a net 250k
10% is not enough to maintain a welfare state, something the electorate desires