This is pretty much about metacritic.
If you hate metacritic for doing a game of you unjust or perhaps you think its stupid generally: Please save us the speech and get out of the thread.
Now,
For 4 years, Sony has had a title that gets a higher meta on the PS3 than its HD twin rival, MS with the X360.
In 2008, LittleBigPlanet got a score of 95 + Metal Gear Solid 4 at 94 whereas Gears of War 2 landed on 93.
In 2009, Uncharted 2 got a score of 96 whereas Forza 3 landed on 92.
In 2010, God of War 3 got a score of 92 whereas Halo Reach landed on 91.
In 2011, Uncharted 3 got a score of 92 + LittleBigPlanet 2 at 91 whereas Gears 3 / Forza 4 landed on 91.
And now:
In 2012, the year where Sony really had nothing, and MS has their biggest budget game of like ever, Journey comes out and lands on 92. The closest thing youll find here is Trials Evolution at 90 since even Halo 4 could not get a meta score to compete.
Discuss this pointless topic now. Is Sony paying the reviewers/site? Are the critics loving the PS3s games more due to their nature of innovation?
User has been banned for this post ~Barozi
